此版本仍在开发中,尚未被视为稳定版本。对于最新的稳定版本,请使用 Spring Security 6.4.3! |
Spring MVC 集成
Spring Security 提供了许多与 Spring MVC 的可选集成。 本节将更详细地介绍集成。
@EnableWebMvcSecurity
从 Spring Security 4.0 开始,@EnableWebMvcSecurity 已弃用。
替代是@EnableWebSecurity 这将决定根据 Classpath 添加 Spring MVC 功能。 |
要启用 Spring Security 与 Spring MVC 的集成,请添加@EnableWebSecurity
注释添加到您的配置中。
Spring Security 使用 Spring MVC 的WebMvcConfigurer提供配置。
这意味着,如果您使用的是更高级的选项,例如与WebMvcConfigurationSupport 直接提供,则需要手动提供 Spring Security 配置。 |
MvcRequestMatcher
Spring Security 提供了与 Spring MVC 在 URL 上的匹配方式的深度集成MvcRequestMatcher
.
这有助于确保您的 Security 规则与用于处理请求的逻辑匹配。
为了使用MvcRequestMatcher
您必须将 Spring Security Configuration 放在相同的ApplicationContext
作为您的DispatcherServlet
.
这是必要的,因为 Spring Security 的MvcRequestMatcher
期望HandlerMappingIntrospector
bean 的名称为mvcHandlerMappingIntrospector
由用于执行匹配的 Spring MVC 配置注册。
对于web.xml
这意味着您应该将配置放在DispatcherServlet.xml
.
<listener>
<listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener</listener-class>
</listener>
<!-- All Spring Configuration (both MVC and Security) are in /WEB-INF/spring/ -->
<context-param>
<param-name>contextConfigLocation</param-name>
<param-value>/WEB-INF/spring/*.xml</param-value>
</context-param>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>spring</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class>
<!-- Load from the ContextLoaderListener -->
<init-param>
<param-name>contextConfigLocation</param-name>
<param-value></param-value>
</init-param>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>spring</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
下面WebSecurityConfiguration
in 放置在DispatcherServlet
sApplicationContext
.
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public class SecurityInitializer extends
AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {
@Override
protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {
return null;
}
@Override
protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {
return new Class[] { RootConfiguration.class,
WebMvcConfiguration.class };
}
@Override
protected String[] getServletMappings() {
return new String[] { "/" };
}
}
class SecurityInitializer : AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer() {
override fun getRootConfigClasses(): Array<Class<*>>? {
return null
}
override fun getServletConfigClasses(): Array<Class<*>> {
return arrayOf(
RootConfiguration::class.java,
WebMvcConfiguration::class.java
)
}
override fun getServletMappings(): Array<String> {
return arrayOf("/")
}
}
始终建议通过匹配 |
考虑一个映射如下的控制器:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@RequestMapping("/admin")
public String admin() {
@RequestMapping("/admin")
fun admin(): String {
如果我们想将对此控制器方法的访问限制为管理员用户,开发人员可以通过匹配HttpServletRequest
替换为以下内容:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@Bean
public SecurityFilterChain filterChain(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.authorizeHttpRequests((authorize) -> authorize
.requestMatchers("/admin").hasRole("ADMIN")
);
return http.build();
}
@Bean
open fun filterChain(http: HttpSecurity): SecurityFilterChain {
http {
authorizeHttpRequests {
authorize("/admin", hasRole("ADMIN"))
}
}
return http.build()
}
或 XML 格式
<http>
<intercept-url pattern="/admin" access="hasRole('ADMIN')"/>
</http>
无论使用哪种配置,URL/admin
将要求经过身份验证的用户是管理员用户。
但是,根据我们的 Spring MVC 配置,URL/admin.html
也会映射到我们的admin()
方法。
此外,根据我们的 Spring MVC 配置,URL/admin/
也会映射到我们的admin()
方法。
问题在于,我们的安全规则只是保护/admin
.
我们可以为 Spring MVC 的所有排列添加额外的规则,但这将非常冗长和乏味。
幸运的是,在使用requestMatchers
DSL 方法,Spring Security 会自动创建一个MvcRequestMatcher
如果它检测到 Spring MVC 在 Classpath 中可用。
因此,它将通过使用 Spring MVC 匹配 URL 来保护 Spring MVC 将匹配的相同 URL。
使用 Spring MVC 时的一个常见要求是指定 servlet path 属性,为此你可以使用MvcRequestMatcher.Builder
创建多个MvcRequestMatcher
共享同一 servlet 路径的实例:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@Bean
public SecurityFilterChain filterChain(HttpSecurity http, HandlerMappingIntrospector introspector) throws Exception {
MvcRequestMatcher.Builder mvcMatcherBuilder = new MvcRequestMatcher.Builder(introspector).servletPath("/path");
http
.authorizeHttpRequests((authorize) -> authorize
.requestMatchers(mvcMatcherBuilder.pattern("/admin")).hasRole("ADMIN")
.requestMatchers(mvcMatcherBuilder.pattern("/user")).hasRole("USER")
);
return http.build();
}
@Bean
open fun filterChain(http: HttpSecurity, introspector: HandlerMappingIntrospector): SecurityFilterChain {
val mvcMatcherBuilder = MvcRequestMatcher.Builder(introspector)
http {
authorizeHttpRequests {
authorize(mvcMatcherBuilder.pattern("/admin"), hasRole("ADMIN"))
authorize(mvcMatcherBuilder.pattern("/user"), hasRole("USER"))
}
}
return http.build()
}
@AuthenticationPrincipal
Spring Security 提供AuthenticationPrincipalArgumentResolver
可以自动解析当前的Authentication.getPrincipal()
对于 Spring MVC 参数。
通过使用@EnableWebSecurity
你会自动将其添加到你的 Spring MVC 配置中。
如果使用基于 XML 的配置,则必须自行添加此配置。
例如:
<mvc:annotation-driven>
<mvc:argument-resolvers>
<bean class="org.springframework.security.web.method.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipalArgumentResolver" />
</mvc:argument-resolvers>
</mvc:annotation-driven>
一次AuthenticationPrincipalArgumentResolver
正确配置后,您可以在 Spring MVC 层中与 Spring Security 完全解耦。
考虑自定义UserDetailsService
返回一个Object
实现UserDetails
和你自己的CustomUser
Object
.这CustomUser
可以使用以下代码访问当前经过身份验证的用户:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
public ModelAndView findMessagesForUser() {
Authentication authentication =
SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();
CustomUser custom = (CustomUser) authentication == null ? null : authentication.getPrincipal();
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
open fun findMessagesForUser(): ModelAndView {
val authentication: Authentication = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().authentication
val custom: CustomUser? = if (authentication as CustomUser == null) null else authentication.principal
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
从 Spring Security 3.2 开始,我们可以通过添加 Comments 来更直接地解决参数。例如:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
import org.springframework.security.core.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipal;
// ...
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
public ModelAndView findMessagesForUser(@AuthenticationPrincipal CustomUser customUser) {
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
open fun findMessagesForUser(@AuthenticationPrincipal customUser: CustomUser?): ModelAndView {
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
Sometimes it may be necessary to transform the principal in some way.
For example, if CustomUser
needed to be final it could not be extended.
In this situation the UserDetailsService
might returns an Object
that implements UserDetails
and provides a method named getCustomUser
to access CustomUser
.
For example, it might look like:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public class CustomUserUserDetails extends User {
// ...
public CustomUser getCustomUser() {
return customUser;
}
}
class CustomUserUserDetails(
username: String?,
password: String?,
authorities: MutableCollection<out GrantedAuthority>?
) : User(username, password, authorities) {
// ...
val customUser: CustomUser? = null
}
We could then access the CustomUser
using a SpEL expression that uses Authentication.getPrincipal()
as the root object:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
import org.springframework.security.core.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipal;
// ...
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
public ModelAndView findMessagesForUser(@AuthenticationPrincipal(expression = "customUser") CustomUser customUser) {
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
import org.springframework.security.core.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipal
// ...
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
open fun findMessagesForUser(@AuthenticationPrincipal(expression = "customUser") customUser: CustomUser?): ModelAndView {
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
We can also refer to Beans in our SpEL expressions.
For example, the following could be used if we were using JPA to manage our Users and we wanted to modify and save a property on the current user.
-
Java
-
Kotlin
import org.springframework.security.core.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipal;
// ...
@PutMapping("/users/self")
public ModelAndView updateName(@AuthenticationPrincipal(expression = "@jpaEntityManager.merge(#this)") CustomUser attachedCustomUser,
@RequestParam String firstName) {
// change the firstName on an attached instance which will be persisted to the database
attachedCustomUser.setFirstName(firstName);
// ...
}
import org.springframework.security.core.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipal
// ...
@PutMapping("/users/self")
open fun updateName(
@AuthenticationPrincipal(expression = "@jpaEntityManager.merge(#this)") attachedCustomUser: CustomUser,
@RequestParam firstName: String?
): ModelAndView {
// change the firstName on an attached instance which will be persisted to the database
attachedCustomUser.setFirstName(firstName)
// ...
}
We can further remove our dependency on Spring Security by making @AuthenticationPrincipal
a meta annotation on our own annotation.
Below we demonstrate how we could do this on an annotation named @CurrentUser
.
It is important to realize that in order to remove the dependency on Spring Security, it is the consuming application that would create @CurrentUser
.
This step is not strictly required, but assists in isolating your dependency to Spring Security to a more central location.
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@Target({ElementType.PARAMETER, ElementType.TYPE})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@AuthenticationPrincipal
public @interface CurrentUser {}
@Target(AnnotationTarget.VALUE_PARAMETER, AnnotationTarget.TYPE)
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
@MustBeDocumented
@AuthenticationPrincipal
annotation class CurrentUser
Now that @CurrentUser
has been specified, we can use it to signal to resolve our CustomUser
of the currently authenticated user.
We have also isolated our dependency on Spring Security to a single file.
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
public ModelAndView findMessagesForUser(@CurrentUser CustomUser customUser) {
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
@RequestMapping("/messages/inbox")
open fun findMessagesForUser(@CurrentUser customUser: CustomUser?): ModelAndView {
// .. find messages for this user and return them ...
}
Spring MVC Async Integration
Spring Web MVC 3.2+ has excellent support for Asynchronous Request Processing.
With no additional configuration, Spring Security will automatically setup the SecurityContext
to the Thread
that invokes a Callable
returned by your controllers.
For example, the following method will automatically have its Callable
invoked with the SecurityContext
that was available when the Callable
was created:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.POST)
public Callable<String> processUpload(final MultipartFile file) {
return new Callable<String>() {
public Object call() throws Exception {
// ...
return "someView";
}
};
}
@RequestMapping(method = [RequestMethod.POST])
open fun processUpload(file: MultipartFile?): Callable<String> {
return Callable {
// ...
"someView"
}
}
Associating SecurityContext to Callable’s
More technically speaking, Spring Security integrates with WebAsyncManager
.
The SecurityContext
that is used to process the Callable
is the SecurityContext
that exists on the SecurityContextHolder
at the time startCallableProcessing
is invoked.
There is no automatic integration with a DeferredResult
that is returned by controllers.
This is because DeferredResult
is processed by the users and thus there is no way of automatically integrating with it.
However, you can still use Concurrency Support to provide transparent integration with Spring Security.
Spring MVC and CSRF Integration
Automatic Token Inclusion
Spring Security will automatically include the CSRF Token within forms that use the Spring MVC form tag.
For example, the following JSP:
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"
xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core"
xmlns:form="http://www.springframework.org/tags/form" version="2.0">
<jsp:directive.page language="java" contentType="text/html" />
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<!-- ... -->
<c:url var="logoutUrl" value="/logout"/>
<form:form action="${logoutUrl}"
method="post">
<input type="submit"
value="Log out" />
<input type="hidden"
name="${_csrf.parameterName}"
value="${_csrf.token}"/>
</form:form>
<!-- ... -->
</html>
</jsp:root>
Will output HTML that is similar to the following:
<!-- ... -->
<form action="/context/logout" method="post">
<input type="submit" value="Log out"/>
<input type="hidden" name="_csrf" value="f81d4fae-7dec-11d0-a765-00a0c91e6bf6"/>
</form>
<!-- ... -->
Resolving the CsrfToken
Spring Security provides CsrfTokenArgumentResolver
which can automatically resolve the current CsrfToken
for Spring MVC arguments.
By using @EnableWebSecurity you will automatically have this added to your Spring MVC configuration.
If you use XML based configuration, you must add this yourself.
Once CsrfTokenArgumentResolver
is properly configured, you can expose the CsrfToken
to your static HTML based application.
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@RestController
public class CsrfController {
@RequestMapping("/csrf")
public CsrfToken csrf(CsrfToken token) {
return token;
}
}
@RestController
class CsrfController {
@RequestMapping("/csrf")
fun csrf(token: CsrfToken): CsrfToken {
return token
}
}
It is important to keep the CsrfToken
a secret from other domains.
This means if you are using Cross Origin Sharing (CORS), you should NOT expose the CsrfToken
to any external domains.