This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Integration 6.3.4!spring-doc.cn

This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Integration 6.3.4!spring-doc.cn

As described in the Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP) book, the idea behind the control bus is that the same messaging system can be used for monitoring and managing the components within the framework as is used for “application-level” messaging. In Spring Integration, we build upon the adapters described above so that you can send messages as a means of invoking exposed operations.spring-doc.cn

Since Control Bus is powerful enough to make changes into the system state, it is recommended to secure its messages reception (see SecurityContextChannelInterceptor) and expose Control Bus management (message source) only into DMZ.
Since Control Bus is powerful enough to make changes into the system state, it is recommended to secure its messages reception (see SecurityContextChannelInterceptor) and expose Control Bus management (message source) only into DMZ.

The following example shows how to configure a control bus with XML:spring-doc.cn

<int:control-bus input-channel="operationChannel"/>

The control bus has an input channel that can be accessed for invoking operations on the beans in the application context. It also has all the common properties of a service activating endpoint. For example, you can specify an output channel if the result of the operation has a return value that you want to send on to a downstream channel.spring-doc.cn

The control bus runs messages on the input channel as a managed operation in a simple string format like beanName.methodName. The arguments for the target method parameters must be supplied as a list in the IntegrationMessageHeaderAccessor.CONTROL_BUS_ARGUMENTS header. The bean and the method to call is resolved from the ControlBusCommandRegistry infrastructure bean. By default, the ControlBusCommandRegistry registers commands on demand: its eagerInitialization flag can be turned on via @EnableIntegrationManagement(loadControlBusCommands = "true").spring-doc.cn

The functionality of Control Bus is similar to JMX, therefore method eligibility for command must honor these requirements:spring-doc.cn

  • The method that has been annotated with @ManagedAttribute or @ManagedOperation;spring-doc.cn

  • Spring’s Lifecycle interface (and its Pausable extension since version 5.2);spring-doc.cn

  • The methods that are used to configure several of Spring’s TaskExecutor and TaskScheduler implementations.spring-doc.cn

The simplest way to ensure that your own methods are available to the control bus is to use the @ManagedAttribute or @ManagedOperation annotations. Since those annotations are also used for exposing methods to a JMX MBean registry, they offer a convenient by-product: often, the same types of operations you want to expose to the control bus are reasonable for exposing through JMX). See more information in the ControlBusCommandRegistry and ControlBusMethodFilter Javadocs.spring-doc.cn

To execute a method on a Spring Bean, a client could send a message to the operation channel as follows:spring-doc.cn

Message<?> operation = MessageBuilder.withPayload("myServiceBean.shutdown").build();
operationChannel.send(operation);

If target method to call has arguments (e.g. ThreadPoolTaskExecutor.setMaxPoolSize(int maxPoolSize)), those values has to be provided as IntegrationMessageHeaderAccessor.CONTROL_BUS_ARGUMENTS header:spring-doc.cn

Message<?> operation =
        MessageBuilder.withPayload("myTaskExecutor.setMaxPoolSize")
        .setHeader(IntegrationMessageHeaderAccessor.CONTROL_BUS_ARGUMENTS, List.of(10))
        .build();
operationChannel.send(operation);

You can think about these commands as PreparedStatement instances in JDBC with parameter binding. The types of arguments must match types of method parameters. They are used as additional criteria to select a method to call according to Java method overloading feature. For example the component:spring-doc.cn

@ManagedResource
class TestManagementComponent {

    @ManagedOperation
    public void operation() {

    }

    @ManagedOperation(description = "The overloaded operation with int argument")
    public void operation(int input) {

    }

    @ManagedOperation(description = "The overloaded operation with two arguments")
    public void operation(int input1, String input2) {

    }

    @ManagedOperation
    public int operation2() {
    	return 123;
    }

}

will expose 3 commands with operation name. When we call testManagementComponent.operation command, we should choose a proper list of values for the IntegrationMessageHeaderAccessor.CONTROL_BUS_ARGUMENTS header to let the ControlBusCommandRegistry to filter out the target method on the bean.spring-doc.cn

With Java annotations, you can configure the control bus as follows:spring-doc.cn

@Bean
@ServiceActivator(inputChannel = "operationChannel")
public ControlBusFactoryBean controlBus() {
    return new ControlBusFactoryBean();
}

Similarly, you can configure Java DSL flow definitions as follows:spring-doc.cn

@Bean
public IntegrationFlow controlBusFlow() {
    return IntegrationFlow.from("controlBus")
              .controlBus()
              .get();
}

If you prefer to use lambdas with automatic DirectChannel creation, you can create a control bus as follows:spring-doc.cn

@Bean
public IntegrationFlow controlBus() {
    return IntegrationFlowDefinition::controlBus;
}

In this case, the channel is named controlBus.input.spring-doc.cn

Also, see Control Bus REST Controller for exposing Control Bus management over HTTP.spring-doc.cn