This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Framework 6.1.13! |
This version is still in development and is not considered stable yet. For the latest stable version, please use Spring Framework 6.1.13! |
This section describes how to use Spring’s JMS components.
Using JmsTemplate
The JmsTemplate
class is the central class in the JMS core package. It simplifies the
use of JMS, since it handles the creation and release of resources when sending or
synchronously receiving messages.
Code that uses the JmsTemplate
needs only to implement callback interfaces that give them
a clearly defined high-level contract. The MessageCreator
callback interface creates a
message when given a Session
provided by the calling code in JmsTemplate
. To
allow for more complex usage of the JMS API, SessionCallback
provides the
JMS session, and ProducerCallback
exposes a Session
and
MessageProducer
pair.
The JMS API exposes two types of send methods, one that takes delivery mode, priority,
and time-to-live as Quality of Service (QOS) parameters and one that takes no QOS
parameters and uses default values. Since JmsTemplate
has many send methods,
setting the QOS parameters have been exposed as bean properties to
avoid duplication in the number of send methods. Similarly, the timeout value for
synchronous receive calls is set by using the setReceiveTimeout
property.
Some JMS providers allow the setting of default QOS values administratively through the
configuration of the ConnectionFactory
. This has the effect that a call to a
MessageProducer
instance’s send
method (send(Destination destination, Message message)
)
uses different QOS default values than those specified in the JMS specification. In order
to provide consistent management of QOS values, the JmsTemplate
must, therefore, be
specifically enabled to use its own QOS values by setting the boolean property
isExplicitQosEnabled
to true
.
For convenience, JmsTemplate
also exposes a basic request-reply operation that allows
for sending a message and waiting for a reply on a temporary queue that is created as part of
the operation.
Instances of the JmsTemplate class are thread-safe, once configured. This is
important, because it means that you can configure a single instance of a JmsTemplate
and then safely inject this shared reference into multiple collaborators. To be
clear, the JmsTemplate is stateful, in that it maintains a reference to a
ConnectionFactory , but this state is not conversational state.
|
As of Spring Framework 4.1, JmsMessagingTemplate
is built on top of JmsTemplate
and provides an integration with the messaging abstraction — that is,
org.springframework.messaging.Message
. This lets you create the message to
send in a generic manner.
Instances of the JmsTemplate class are thread-safe, once configured. This is
important, because it means that you can configure a single instance of a JmsTemplate
and then safely inject this shared reference into multiple collaborators. To be
clear, the JmsTemplate is stateful, in that it maintains a reference to a
ConnectionFactory , but this state is not conversational state.
|
Connections
The JmsTemplate
requires a reference to a ConnectionFactory
. The ConnectionFactory
is part of the JMS specification and serves as the entry point for working with JMS. It
is used by the client application as a factory to create connections with the JMS
provider and encapsulates various configuration parameters, many of which are
vendor-specific, such as SSL configuration options.
When using JMS inside an EJB, the vendor provides implementations of the JMS interfaces
so that they can participate in declarative transaction management and perform pooling
of connections and sessions. In order to use this implementation, Jakarta EE containers
typically require that you declare a JMS connection factory as a resource-ref
inside
the EJB or servlet deployment descriptors. To ensure the use of these features with the
JmsTemplate
inside an EJB, the client application should ensure that it references the
managed implementation of the ConnectionFactory
.
Caching Messaging Resources
The standard API involves creating many intermediate objects. To send a message, the following 'API' walk is performed:
ConnectionFactory->Connection->Session->MessageProducer->send
Between the ConnectionFactory
and the Send
operation, three intermediate
objects are created and destroyed. To optimize the resource usage and increase
performance, Spring provides two implementations of ConnectionFactory
.
Using SingleConnectionFactory
Spring provides an implementation of the ConnectionFactory
interface,
SingleConnectionFactory
, that returns the same Connection
on all
createConnection()
calls and ignores calls to close()
. This is useful for testing and
standalone environments so that the same connection can be used for multiple
JmsTemplate
calls that may span any number of transactions. SingleConnectionFactory
takes a reference to a standard ConnectionFactory
that would typically come from JNDI.
Using CachingConnectionFactory
The CachingConnectionFactory
extends the functionality of SingleConnectionFactory
and adds the caching of Session
, MessageProducer
, and MessageConsumer
instances.
The initial cache size is set to 1
. You can use the sessionCacheSize
property to
increase the number of cached sessions. Note that the number of actual cached sessions
is more than that number, as sessions are cached based on their acknowledgment mode,
so there can be up to four cached session instances (one for each acknowledgment mode)
when sessionCacheSize
is set to one. MessageProducer
and MessageConsumer
instances
are cached within their owning session and also take into account the unique properties
of the producers and consumers when caching. MessageProducers are cached based on their
destination. MessageConsumers are cached based on a key composed of the destination, selector,
noLocal delivery flag, and the durable subscription name (if creating durable consumers).
MessageProducers and MessageConsumers for temporary queues and topics
(TemporaryQueue/TemporaryTopic) will never be cached. Unfortunately, WebLogic JMS happens
to implement the temporary queue/topic interfaces on its regular destination implementation,
mis-indicating that none of its destinations can be cached. Please use a different connection
pool/cache on WebLogic, or customize |
MessageProducers and MessageConsumers for temporary queues and topics
(TemporaryQueue/TemporaryTopic) will never be cached. Unfortunately, WebLogic JMS happens
to implement the temporary queue/topic interfaces on its regular destination implementation,
mis-indicating that none of its destinations can be cached. Please use a different connection
pool/cache on WebLogic, or customize |
Destination Management
Destinations, as ConnectionFactory
instances, are JMS administered objects that you can store
and retrieve in JNDI. When configuring a Spring application context, you can use the
JNDI JndiObjectFactoryBean
factory class or <jee:jndi-lookup>
to perform dependency
injection on your object’s references to JMS destinations. However, this strategy
is often cumbersome if there are a large number of destinations in the application or if there
are advanced destination management features unique to the JMS provider. Examples of
such advanced destination management include the creation of dynamic destinations or
support for a hierarchical namespace of destinations. The JmsTemplate
delegates the
resolution of a destination name to a JMS destination object that implements the
DestinationResolver
interface. DynamicDestinationResolver
is the default
implementation used by JmsTemplate
and accommodates resolving dynamic destinations. A
JndiDestinationResolver
is also provided to act as a service locator for
destinations contained in JNDI and optionally falls back to the behavior contained in
DynamicDestinationResolver
.
Quite often, the destinations used in a JMS application are only known at runtime and,
therefore, cannot be administratively created when the application is deployed. This is
often because there is shared application logic between interacting system components
that create destinations at runtime according to a well-known naming convention. Even
though the creation of dynamic destinations is not part of the JMS specification, most
vendors have provided this functionality. Dynamic destinations are created with a user-defined name,
which differentiates them from temporary destinations, and are often
not registered in JNDI. The API used to create dynamic destinations varies from provider
to provider since the properties associated with the destination are vendor-specific.
However, a simple implementation choice that is sometimes made by vendors is to
disregard the warnings in the JMS specification and to use the method TopicSession
createTopic(String topicName)
or the QueueSession
createQueue(String
queueName)
method to create a new destination with default destination properties. Depending
on the vendor implementation, DynamicDestinationResolver
can then also create a
physical destination instead of only resolving one.
The boolean property pubSubDomain
is used to configure the JmsTemplate
with
knowledge of what JMS domain is being used. By default, the value of this property is
false, indicating that the point-to-point domain, Queues
, is to be used. This property
(used by JmsTemplate
) determines the behavior of dynamic destination resolution through
implementations of the DestinationResolver
interface.
You can also configure the JmsTemplate
with a default destination through the
property defaultDestination
. The default destination is with send and receive
operations that do not refer to a specific destination.
Message Listener Containers
One of the most common uses of JMS messages in the EJB world is to drive message-driven
beans (MDBs). Spring offers a solution to create message-driven POJOs (MDPs) in a way
that does not tie a user to an EJB container. (See Asynchronous reception: Message-Driven POJOs for detailed
coverage of Spring’s MDP support.) Since Spring Framework 4.1, endpoint methods can be
annotated with @JmsListener
— see Annotation-driven Listener Endpoints for more details.
A message listener container is used to receive messages from a JMS message queue and
drive the MessageListener
that is injected into it. The listener container is
responsible for all threading of message reception and dispatches into the listener for
processing. A message listener container is the intermediary between an MDP and a
messaging provider and takes care of registering to receive messages, participating in
transactions, resource acquisition and release, exception conversion, and so on. This
lets you write the (possibly complex) business logic
associated with receiving a message (and possibly respond to it), and delegates
boilerplate JMS infrastructure concerns to the framework.
There are two standard JMS message listener containers packaged with Spring, each with its specialized feature set.
Using SimpleMessageListenerContainer
This message listener container is the simpler of the two standard flavors. It creates
a fixed number of JMS sessions and consumers at startup, registers the listener by using
the standard JMS MessageConsumer.setMessageListener()
method, and leaves it up the JMS
provider to perform listener callbacks. This variant does not allow for dynamic adaption
to runtime demands or for participation in externally managed transactions.
Compatibility-wise, it stays very close to the spirit of the standalone JMS
specification, but is generally not compatible with Jakarta EE’s JMS restrictions.
While SimpleMessageListenerContainer does not allow for participation in externally
managed transactions, it does support native JMS transactions. To enable this feature,
you can switch the sessionTransacted flag to true or, in the XML namespace, set the
acknowledge attribute to transacted . Exceptions thrown from your listener then lead
to a rollback, with the message getting redelivered. Alternatively, consider using
CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE mode, which provides redelivery in case of an exception as well but
does not use transacted Session instances and, therefore, does not include any other
Session operations (such as sending response messages) in the transaction protocol.
|
The default AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE mode does not provide proper reliability guarantees.
Messages can get lost when listener execution fails (since the provider automatically
acknowledges each message after listener invocation, with no exceptions to be propagated to
the provider) or when the listener container shuts down (you can configure this by setting
the acceptMessagesWhileStopping flag). Make sure to use transacted sessions in case of
reliability needs (for example, for reliable queue handling and durable topic subscriptions).
|
Using DefaultMessageListenerContainer
This message listener container is used in most cases. In contrast to
SimpleMessageListenerContainer
, this container variant allows for dynamic adaptation
to runtime demands and is able to participate in externally managed transactions.
Each received message is registered with an XA transaction when configured with a
JtaTransactionManager
. As a result, processing may take advantage of XA transaction
semantics. This listener container strikes a good balance between low requirements on
the JMS provider, advanced functionality (such as participation in externally managed
transactions), and compatibility with Jakarta EE environments.
You can customize the cache level of the container. Note that, when no caching is enabled, a new connection and a new session is created for each message reception. Combining this with a non-durable subscription with high loads may lead to message loss. Make sure to use a proper cache level in such a case.
This container also has recoverable capabilities when the broker goes down. By default,
a simple BackOff
implementation retries every five seconds. You can specify
a custom BackOff
implementation for more fine-grained recovery options. See
ExponentialBackOff
for an example.
Like its sibling (SimpleMessageListenerContainer ),
DefaultMessageListenerContainer supports native JMS transactions and allows for
customizing the acknowledgment mode. If feasible for your scenario, This is strongly
recommended over externally managed transactions — that is, if you can live with
occasional duplicate messages in case of the JVM dying. Custom duplicate message
detection steps in your business logic can cover such situations — for example,
in the form of a business entity existence check or a protocol table check.
Any such arrangements are significantly more efficient than the alternative:
wrapping your entire processing with an XA transaction (through configuring your
DefaultMessageListenerContainer with an JtaTransactionManager ) to cover the
reception of the JMS message as well as the execution of the business logic in your
message listener (including database operations, etc.).
|
The default AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE mode does not provide proper reliability guarantees.
Messages can get lost when listener execution fails (since the provider automatically
acknowledges each message after listener invocation, with no exceptions to be propagated to
the provider) or when the listener container shuts down (you can configure this by setting
the acceptMessagesWhileStopping flag). Make sure to use transacted sessions in case of
reliability needs (for example, for reliable queue handling and durable topic subscriptions).
|
While SimpleMessageListenerContainer does not allow for participation in externally
managed transactions, it does support native JMS transactions. To enable this feature,
you can switch the sessionTransacted flag to true or, in the XML namespace, set the
acknowledge attribute to transacted . Exceptions thrown from your listener then lead
to a rollback, with the message getting redelivered. Alternatively, consider using
CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE mode, which provides redelivery in case of an exception as well but
does not use transacted Session instances and, therefore, does not include any other
Session operations (such as sending response messages) in the transaction protocol.
|
The default AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE mode does not provide proper reliability guarantees.
Messages can get lost when listener execution fails (since the provider automatically
acknowledges each message after listener invocation, with no exceptions to be propagated to
the provider) or when the listener container shuts down (you can configure this by setting
the acceptMessagesWhileStopping flag). Make sure to use transacted sessions in case of
reliability needs (for example, for reliable queue handling and durable topic subscriptions).
|
Like its sibling (SimpleMessageListenerContainer ),
DefaultMessageListenerContainer supports native JMS transactions and allows for
customizing the acknowledgment mode. If feasible for your scenario, This is strongly
recommended over externally managed transactions — that is, if you can live with
occasional duplicate messages in case of the JVM dying. Custom duplicate message
detection steps in your business logic can cover such situations — for example,
in the form of a business entity existence check or a protocol table check.
Any such arrangements are significantly more efficient than the alternative:
wrapping your entire processing with an XA transaction (through configuring your
DefaultMessageListenerContainer with an JtaTransactionManager ) to cover the
reception of the JMS message as well as the execution of the business logic in your
message listener (including database operations, etc.).
|
The default AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE mode does not provide proper reliability guarantees.
Messages can get lost when listener execution fails (since the provider automatically
acknowledges each message after listener invocation, with no exceptions to be propagated to
the provider) or when the listener container shuts down (you can configure this by setting
the acceptMessagesWhileStopping flag). Make sure to use transacted sessions in case of
reliability needs (for example, for reliable queue handling and durable topic subscriptions).
|
Transaction Management
Spring provides a JmsTransactionManager
that manages transactions for a single JMS
ConnectionFactory
. This lets JMS applications leverage the managed-transaction
features of Spring, as described in
Transaction Management section of the Data Access chapter.
The JmsTransactionManager
performs local resource transactions, binding a JMS
Connection/Session pair from the specified ConnectionFactory
to the thread.
JmsTemplate
automatically detects such transactional resources and operates
on them accordingly.
In a Jakarta EE environment, the ConnectionFactory
pools Connection and Session instances,
so those resources are efficiently reused across transactions. In a standalone environment,
using Spring’s SingleConnectionFactory
result in a shared JMS Connection
, with
each transaction having its own independent Session
. Alternatively, consider the use
of a provider-specific pooling adapter, such as ActiveMQ’s PooledConnectionFactory
class.
You can also use JmsTemplate
with the JtaTransactionManager
and an XA-capable JMS
ConnectionFactory
to perform distributed transactions. Note that this requires the
use of a JTA transaction manager as well as a properly XA-configured ConnectionFactory.
(Check your Jakarta EE server’s or JMS provider’s documentation.)
Reusing code across a managed and unmanaged transactional environment can be confusing
when using the JMS API to create a Session
from a Connection
. This is because the
JMS API has only one factory method to create a Session
, and it requires values for the
transaction and acknowledgment modes. In a managed environment, setting these values is
the responsibility of the environment’s transactional infrastructure, so these values
are ignored by the vendor’s wrapper to the JMS Connection. When you use the JmsTemplate
in an unmanaged environment, you can specify these values through the use of the
properties sessionTransacted
and sessionAcknowledgeMode
. When you use a
PlatformTransactionManager
with JmsTemplate
, the template is always given a
transactional JMS Session
.