If you prefer an XML-based format, Spring also offers support for defining aspects
using the aop
namespace tags. The exact same pointcut expressions and advice kinds
as when using the @AspectJ style are supported. Hence, in this section we focus on
that syntax and refer the reader to the discussion in the previous section
(@AspectJ support) for an understanding of writing pointcut expressions and the binding
of advice parameters.
To use the aop namespace tags described in this section, you need to import the
spring-aop
schema, as described in XML Schema-based configuration
. See the AOP schema
for how to import the tags in the aop
namespace.
Within your Spring configurations, all aspect and advisor elements must be placed within
an <aop:config>
element (you can have more than one <aop:config>
element in an
application context configuration). An <aop:config>
element can contain pointcut,
advisor, and aspect elements (note that these must be declared in that order).
The <aop:config> style of configuration makes heavy use of Spring’s
auto-proxying mechanism. This can cause issues (such as advice
not being woven) if you already use explicit auto-proxying through the use of
BeanNameAutoProxyCreator or something similar. The recommended usage pattern is to
use either only the <aop:config> style or only the AutoProxyCreator style and
never mix them.
|
The <aop:config> style of configuration makes heavy use of Spring’s
auto-proxying mechanism. This can cause issues (such as advice
not being woven) if you already use explicit auto-proxying through the use of
BeanNameAutoProxyCreator or something similar. The recommended usage pattern is to
use either only the <aop:config> style or only the AutoProxyCreator style and
never mix them.
|
Declaring an Aspect
When you use the schema support, an aspect is a regular Java object defined as a bean in your Spring application context. The state and behavior are captured in the fields and methods of the object, and the pointcut and advice information are captured in the XML.
You can declare an aspect by using the <aop:aspect>
element, and reference the backing bean
by using the ref
attribute, as the following example shows:
<aop:config>
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
...
</aop:aspect>
</aop:config>
<bean id="aBean" class="...">
...
</bean>
The bean that backs the aspect (aBean
in this case) can of course be configured and
dependency injected just like any other Spring bean.
Declaring a Pointcut
You can declare a named pointcut inside an <aop:config>
element, letting the pointcut
definition be shared across several aspects and advisors.
A pointcut that represents the execution of any business service in the service layer can be defined as follows:
<aop:config>
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))" />
</aop:config>
Note that the pointcut expression itself uses the same AspectJ pointcut expression
language as described in @AspectJ support. If you use the schema based declaration
style, you can also refer to named pointcuts defined in @Aspect
types within the
pointcut expression. Thus, another way of defining the above pointcut would be as follows:
<aop:config>
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
expression="com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()" /> (1)
</aop:config>
1 | References the businessService named pointcut defined in Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions. |
Declaring a pointcut inside an aspect is very similar to declaring a top-level pointcut, as the following example shows:
<aop:config>
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
</aop:config>
In much the same way as an @AspectJ aspect, pointcuts declared by using the schema based
definition style can collect join point context. For example, the following pointcut
collects the this
object as the join point context and passes it to the advice:
<aop:config>
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..)) && this(service)"/>
<aop:before pointcut-ref="businessService" method="monitor"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
</aop:config>
The advice must be declared to receive the collected join point context by including parameters of the matching names, as follows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public void monitor(Object service) {
// ...
}
fun monitor(service: Any) {
// ...
}
When combining pointcut sub-expressions, &&
is awkward within an XML
document, so you can use the and
, or
, and not
keywords in place of &&
,
||
, and !
, respectively. For example, the previous pointcut can be better written as
follows:
<aop:config>
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..)) and this(service)"/>
<aop:before pointcut-ref="businessService" method="monitor"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
</aop:config>
Note that pointcuts defined in this way are referred to by their XML id
and cannot be
used as named pointcuts to form composite pointcuts. The named pointcut support in the
schema-based definition style is thus more limited than that offered by the @AspectJ
style.
1 | References the businessService named pointcut defined in Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions. |
Declaring Advice
The schema-based AOP support uses the same five kinds of advice as the @AspectJ style, and they have exactly the same semantics.
Before Advice
Before advice runs before a matched method execution. It is declared inside an
<aop:aspect>
by using the <aop:before>
element, as the following example shows:
<aop:aspect id="beforeExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:before
pointcut-ref="dataAccessOperation"
method="doAccessCheck"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
In the example above, dataAccessOperation
is the id
of a named pointcut defined at
the top (<aop:config>
) level (see Declaring a Pointcut).
As we noted in the discussion of the @AspectJ style, using named pointcuts can significantly improve the readability of your code. See Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions for details. |
To define the pointcut inline instead, replace the pointcut-ref
attribute with a
pointcut
attribute, as follows:
<aop:aspect id="beforeExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:before
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
method="doAccessCheck"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
The method
attribute identifies a method (doAccessCheck
) that provides the body of
the advice. This method must be defined for the bean referenced by the aspect element
that contains the advice. Before a data access operation is performed (a method execution
join point matched by the pointcut expression), the doAccessCheck
method on the aspect
bean is invoked.
After Returning Advice
After returning advice runs when a matched method execution completes normally. It is
declared inside an <aop:aspect>
in the same way as before advice. The following example
shows how to declare it:
<aop:aspect id="afterReturningExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:after-returning
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
method="doAccessCheck"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
As in the @AspectJ style, you can get the return value within the advice body.
To do so, use the returning
attribute to specify the name of the parameter to which
the return value should be passed, as the following example shows:
<aop:aspect id="afterReturningExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:after-returning
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
returning="retVal"
method="doAccessCheck"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
The doAccessCheck
method must declare a parameter named retVal
. The type of this
parameter constrains matching in the same way as described for @AfterReturning
. For
example, you can declare the method signature as follows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public void doAccessCheck(Object retVal) {...
fun doAccessCheck(retVal: Any) {...
After Throwing Advice
After throwing advice runs when a matched method execution exits by throwing an
exception. It is declared inside an <aop:aspect>
by using the after-throwing
element,
as the following example shows:
<aop:aspect id="afterThrowingExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:after-throwing
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
method="doRecoveryActions"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
As in the @AspectJ style, you can get the thrown exception within the advice body.
To do so, use the throwing
attribute to specify the name of the parameter to
which the exception should be passed as the following example shows:
<aop:aspect id="afterThrowingExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:after-throwing
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
throwing="dataAccessEx"
method="doRecoveryActions"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
The doRecoveryActions
method must declare a parameter named dataAccessEx
.
The type of this parameter constrains matching in the same way as described for
@AfterThrowing
. For example, the method signature may be declared as follows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public void doRecoveryActions(DataAccessException dataAccessEx) {...
fun doRecoveryActions(dataAccessEx: DataAccessException) {...
After (Finally) Advice
After (finally) advice runs no matter how a matched method execution exits.
You can declare it by using the after
element, as the following example shows:
<aop:aspect id="afterFinallyExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:after
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
method="doReleaseLock"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
Around Advice
The last kind of advice is around advice. Around advice runs "around" a matched method’s execution. It has the opportunity to do work both before and after the method runs and to determine when, how, and even if the method actually gets to run at all. Around advice is often used if you need to share state before and after a method execution in a thread-safe manner – for example, starting and stopping a timer.
Always use the least powerful form of advice that meets your requirements. For example, do not use around advice if before advice is sufficient for your needs. |
You can declare around advice by using the aop:around
element. The advice method should
declare Object
as its return type, and the first parameter of the method must be of
type ProceedingJoinPoint
. Within the body of the advice method, you must invoke
proceed()
on the ProceedingJoinPoint
in order for the underlying method to run.
Invoking proceed()
without arguments will result in the caller’s original arguments
being supplied to the underlying method when it is invoked. For advanced use cases, there
is an overloaded variant of the proceed()
method which accepts an array of arguments
(Object[]
). The values in the array will be used as the arguments to the underlying
method when it is invoked. See Around Advice for notes on calling
proceed
with an Object[]
.
The following example shows how to declare around advice in XML:
<aop:aspect id="aroundExample" ref="aBean">
<aop:around
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"
method="doBasicProfiling"/>
...
</aop:aspect>
The implementation of the doBasicProfiling
advice can be exactly the same as in the
@AspectJ example (minus the annotation, of course), as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public Object doBasicProfiling(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
// start stopwatch
Object retVal = pjp.proceed();
// stop stopwatch
return retVal;
}
fun doBasicProfiling(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
// start stopwatch
val retVal = pjp.proceed()
// stop stopwatch
return pjp.proceed()
}
Advice Parameters
The schema-based declaration style supports fully typed advice in the same way as
described for the @AspectJ support — by matching pointcut parameters by name against
advice method parameters. See Advice Parameters for details. If you wish
to explicitly specify argument names for the advice methods (not relying on the
detection strategies previously described), you can do so by using the arg-names
attribute of the advice element, which is treated in the same manner as the argNames
attribute in an advice annotation (as described in Determining Argument Names).
The following example shows how to specify an argument name in XML:
<aop:before
pointcut="com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() and @annotation(auditable)" (1)
method="audit"
arg-names="auditable" />
1 | References the publicMethod named pointcut defined in Combining Pointcut Expressions. |
The arg-names
attribute accepts a comma-delimited list of parameter names.
The following slightly more involved example of the XSD-based approach shows some around advice used in conjunction with a number of strongly typed parameters:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
package com.xyz.service;
public interface PersonService {
Person getPerson(String personName, int age);
}
public class DefaultPersonService implements PersonService {
public Person getPerson(String name, int age) {
return new Person(name, age);
}
}
package com.xyz.service
interface PersonService {
fun getPerson(personName: String, age: Int): Person
}
class DefaultPersonService : PersonService {
fun getPerson(name: String, age: Int): Person {
return Person(name, age)
}
}
Next up is the aspect. Notice the fact that the profile(..)
method accepts a number of
strongly-typed parameters, the first of which happens to be the join point used to
proceed with the method call. The presence of this parameter is an indication that the
profile(..)
is to be used as around
advice, as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
package com.xyz;
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch;
public class SimpleProfiler {
public Object profile(ProceedingJoinPoint call, String name, int age) throws Throwable {
StopWatch clock = new StopWatch("Profiling for '" + name + "' and '" + age + "'");
try {
clock.start(call.toShortString());
return call.proceed();
} finally {
clock.stop();
System.out.println(clock.prettyPrint());
}
}
}
package com.xyz
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch
class SimpleProfiler {
fun profile(call: ProceedingJoinPoint, name: String, age: Int): Any? {
val clock = StopWatch("Profiling for '$name' and '$age'")
try {
clock.start(call.toShortString())
return call.proceed()
} finally {
clock.stop()
println(clock.prettyPrint())
}
}
}
Finally, the following example XML configuration effects the execution of the preceding advice for a particular join point:
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop
https://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop.xsd">
<!-- this is the object that will be proxied by Spring's AOP infrastructure -->
<bean id="personService" class="com.xyz.service.DefaultPersonService"/>
<!-- this is the actual advice itself -->
<bean id="profiler" class="com.xyz.SimpleProfiler"/>
<aop:config>
<aop:aspect ref="profiler">
<aop:pointcut id="theExecutionOfSomePersonServiceMethod"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.PersonService.getPerson(String,int))
and args(name, age)"/>
<aop:around pointcut-ref="theExecutionOfSomePersonServiceMethod"
method="profile"/>
</aop:aspect>
</aop:config>
</beans>
Consider the following driver script:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public class Boot {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml");
PersonService person = ctx.getBean(PersonService.class);
person.getPerson("Pengo", 12);
}
}
fun main() {
val ctx = ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml")
val person = ctx.getBean(PersonService.class)
person.getPerson("Pengo", 12)
}
With such a Boot
class, we would get output similar to the following on standard output:
StopWatch 'Profiling for 'Pengo' and '12': running time (millis) = 0 ----------------------------------------- ms % Task name ----------------------------------------- 00000 ? execution(getFoo)
Advice Ordering
When multiple pieces of advice need to run at the same join point (executing method)
the ordering rules are as described in Advice Ordering. The precedence
between aspects is determined via the order
attribute in the <aop:aspect>
element or
by either adding the @Order
annotation to the bean that backs the aspect or by having
the bean implement the Ordered
interface.
In contrast to the precedence rules for advice methods defined in the same For example, given an As a general rule of thumb, if you find that you have multiple pieces of advice defined
in the same |
As we noted in the discussion of the @AspectJ style, using named pointcuts can significantly improve the readability of your code. See Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions for details. |
Always use the least powerful form of advice that meets your requirements. For example, do not use around advice if before advice is sufficient for your needs. |
1 | References the publicMethod named pointcut defined in Combining Pointcut Expressions. |
In contrast to the precedence rules for advice methods defined in the same For example, given an As a general rule of thumb, if you find that you have multiple pieces of advice defined
in the same |
Introductions
Introductions (known as inter-type declarations in AspectJ) let an aspect declare that advised objects implement a given interface and provide an implementation of that interface on behalf of those objects.
You can make an introduction by using the aop:declare-parents
element inside an aop:aspect
.
You can use the aop:declare-parents
element to declare that matching types have a new parent (hence the name).
For example, given an interface named UsageTracked
and an implementation of that interface named
DefaultUsageTracked
, the following aspect declares that all implementors of service
interfaces also implement the UsageTracked
interface. (In order to expose statistics
through JMX for example.)
<aop:aspect id="usageTrackerAspect" ref="usageTracking">
<aop:declare-parents
types-matching="com.xyz.service.*+"
implement-interface="com.xyz.service.tracking.UsageTracked"
default-impl="com.xyz.service.tracking.DefaultUsageTracked"/>
<aop:before
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))
and this(usageTracked)"
method="recordUsage"/>
</aop:aspect>
The class that backs the usageTracking
bean would then contain the following method:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public void recordUsage(UsageTracked usageTracked) {
usageTracked.incrementUseCount();
}
fun recordUsage(usageTracked: UsageTracked) {
usageTracked.incrementUseCount()
}
The interface to be implemented is determined by the implement-interface
attribute. The
value of the types-matching
attribute is an AspectJ type pattern. Any bean of a
matching type implements the UsageTracked
interface. Note that, in the before
advice of the preceding example, service beans can be directly used as implementations of
the UsageTracked
interface. To access a bean programmatically, you could write the
following:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
UsageTracked usageTracked = context.getBean("myService", UsageTracked.class);
val usageTracked = context.getBean("myService", UsageTracked.class)
Aspect Instantiation Models
The only supported instantiation model for schema-defined aspects is the singleton model. Other instantiation models may be supported in future releases.
Advisors
The concept of "advisors" comes from the AOP support defined in Spring and does not have a direct equivalent in AspectJ. An advisor is like a small self-contained aspect that has a single piece of advice. The advice itself is represented by a bean and must implement one of the advice interfaces described in Advice Types in Spring. Advisors can take advantage of AspectJ pointcut expressions.
Spring supports the advisor concept with the <aop:advisor>
element. You most
commonly see it used in conjunction with transactional advice, which also has its own
namespace support in Spring. The following example shows an advisor:
<aop:config>
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"/>
<aop:advisor
pointcut-ref="businessService"
advice-ref="tx-advice" />
</aop:config>
<tx:advice id="tx-advice">
<tx:attributes>
<tx:method name="*" propagation="REQUIRED"/>
</tx:attributes>
</tx:advice>
As well as the pointcut-ref
attribute used in the preceding example, you can also use the
pointcut
attribute to define a pointcut expression inline.
To define the precedence of an advisor so that the advice can participate in ordering,
use the order
attribute to define the Ordered
value of the advisor.
An AOP Schema Example
This section shows how the concurrent locking failure retry example from An AOP Example looks when rewritten with the schema support.
The execution of business services can sometimes fail due to concurrency issues (for
example, a deadlock loser). If the operation is retried, it is likely to succeed
on the next try. For business services where it is appropriate to retry in such
conditions (idempotent operations that do not need to go back to the user for conflict
resolution), we want to transparently retry the operation to avoid the client seeing a
PessimisticLockingFailureException
. This is a requirement that clearly cuts across
multiple services in the service layer and, hence, is ideal for implementing through an
aspect.
Because we want to retry the operation, we need to use around advice so that we can
call proceed
multiple times. The following listing shows the basic aspect implementation
(which is a regular Java class that uses the schema support):
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public class ConcurrentOperationExecutor implements Ordered {
private static final int DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 2;
private int maxRetries = DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES;
private int order = 1;
public void setMaxRetries(int maxRetries) {
this.maxRetries = maxRetries;
}
public int getOrder() {
return this.order;
}
public void setOrder(int order) {
this.order = order;
}
public Object doConcurrentOperation(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
int numAttempts = 0;
PessimisticLockingFailureException lockFailureException;
do {
numAttempts++;
try {
return pjp.proceed();
}
catch(PessimisticLockingFailureException ex) {
lockFailureException = ex;
}
} while(numAttempts <= this.maxRetries);
throw lockFailureException;
}
}
class ConcurrentOperationExecutor : Ordered {
private val DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 2
private var maxRetries = DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES
private var order = 1
fun setMaxRetries(maxRetries: Int) {
this.maxRetries = maxRetries
}
override fun getOrder(): Int {
return this.order
}
fun setOrder(order: Int) {
this.order = order
}
fun doConcurrentOperation(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
var numAttempts = 0
var lockFailureException: PessimisticLockingFailureException
do {
numAttempts++
try {
return pjp.proceed()
} catch (ex: PessimisticLockingFailureException) {
lockFailureException = ex
}
} while (numAttempts <= this.maxRetries)
throw lockFailureException
}
}
Note that the aspect implements the Ordered
interface so that we can set the precedence of
the aspect higher than the transaction advice (we want a fresh transaction each time we
retry). The maxRetries
and order
properties are both configured by Spring. The
main action happens in the doConcurrentOperation
around advice method. We try to
proceed. If we fail with a PessimisticLockingFailureException
, we try again,
unless we have exhausted all of our retry attempts.
This class is identical to the one used in the @AspectJ example, but with the annotations removed. |
The corresponding Spring configuration is as follows:
<aop:config>
<aop:aspect id="concurrentOperationRetry" ref="concurrentOperationExecutor">
<aop:pointcut id="idempotentOperation"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"/>
<aop:around
pointcut-ref="idempotentOperation"
method="doConcurrentOperation"/>
</aop:aspect>
</aop:config>
<bean id="concurrentOperationExecutor"
class="com.xyz.service.impl.ConcurrentOperationExecutor">
<property name="maxRetries" value="3"/>
<property name="order" value="100"/>
</bean>
Notice that, for the time being, we assume that all business services are idempotent. If
this is not the case, we can refine the aspect so that it retries only genuinely
idempotent operations, by introducing an Idempotent
annotation and using the annotation
to annotate the implementation of service operations, as the following example shows:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
// marker annotation
public @interface Idempotent {
}
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
// marker annotation
annotation class Idempotent
The
change to the aspect to retry only idempotent operations involves refining the
pointcut expression so that only @Idempotent
operations match, as follows:
<aop:pointcut id="idempotentOperation"
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..)) and
@annotation(com.xyz.service.Idempotent)"/>
This class is identical to the one used in the @AspectJ example, but with the annotations removed. |